We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Characterization of two novel mutations in the glucocorticoid receptor gene in patients with primary cortisol resistance.
Clinical Endocrinology 2001 September
OBJECTIVE: Primary glucocorticoid resistance is characterized by decreased sensitivity to cortisol signalling. We have performed genetic analysis of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) gene in 12 unrelated patients with primary cortisol resistance as defined by a pathological dexamethasone suppression test.
METHODS: Exon specific polymerase chain reaction amplification of the GR gene and sequencing of each exon was carried out. The two mutations were characterized in vitro in terms of glucocorticoid driven reporter gene activity in a transient transfection assay and in a ligand binding assay. Molecular modelling of the R477H mutant was performed based on the X-ray structure of the GR-DNA binding domain.
RESULTS: Two novel mutations in the GR gene were found: R477H in the DNA-binding domain which is the first reported mutation in that region of the human GR gene and G679S in the ligand binding domain. The R477H mutation showed no transactivating capacity, whereas the G679S mutation had reduced transactivation capacity compared to the wild-type (wt) GR. When tested for ligand binding capacity, the G679S mutation had 50% binding affinity compared to the wt GR. The effect of the point mutation R477H was deduced by a comparison between the wt structure and the model of the mutant. The wt GR has direct and water mediated contact with the phosphate groups of the glucocorticoid responsive element (GRE) whereas, in the model, the mutation R477H has no contact with the GRE. The G679S mutation is located on the surface of the ligand binding domain, at a distance from the steroid-binding site. A previously reported polymorphism, AAT to AAC at amino acid position 766, was found in four of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In two of 12 patients with clinical glucocorticoid resistance, mutant forms of GR could be found. The glucocorticoid resistance in vivo in these two patients corresponds to impaired function of the two mutated GR forms in two in vitro assays. The relevance of the conservative polymorphism for the glucocorticoid insensitivity noted in these patients remains to be clarified.
METHODS: Exon specific polymerase chain reaction amplification of the GR gene and sequencing of each exon was carried out. The two mutations were characterized in vitro in terms of glucocorticoid driven reporter gene activity in a transient transfection assay and in a ligand binding assay. Molecular modelling of the R477H mutant was performed based on the X-ray structure of the GR-DNA binding domain.
RESULTS: Two novel mutations in the GR gene were found: R477H in the DNA-binding domain which is the first reported mutation in that region of the human GR gene and G679S in the ligand binding domain. The R477H mutation showed no transactivating capacity, whereas the G679S mutation had reduced transactivation capacity compared to the wild-type (wt) GR. When tested for ligand binding capacity, the G679S mutation had 50% binding affinity compared to the wt GR. The effect of the point mutation R477H was deduced by a comparison between the wt structure and the model of the mutant. The wt GR has direct and water mediated contact with the phosphate groups of the glucocorticoid responsive element (GRE) whereas, in the model, the mutation R477H has no contact with the GRE. The G679S mutation is located on the surface of the ligand binding domain, at a distance from the steroid-binding site. A previously reported polymorphism, AAT to AAC at amino acid position 766, was found in four of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In two of 12 patients with clinical glucocorticoid resistance, mutant forms of GR could be found. The glucocorticoid resistance in vivo in these two patients corresponds to impaired function of the two mutated GR forms in two in vitro assays. The relevance of the conservative polymorphism for the glucocorticoid insensitivity noted in these patients remains to be clarified.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app