We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
REVIEW
Surgical treatment of cervical node metastases from squamous carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: evaluation of the evidence for modifications of neck dissection.
Head & Neck 2001 October
BACKGROUND: This review article examines the role of the different types of neck dissection in the treatment of squamous carcinoma metastases to the cervical nodes.
METHODS: A critical evaluation of the literature on the pathologic basis, oncologic effectiveness, and functional outcome of neck dissection.
RESULTS: Pathologic data show preferential metastasis to different lymph node levels, in N0- and N+-staged disease, depending on the primary tumor site. Comparative studies on control of regional metastases suggest that modified radical is no less effective than radical neck dissection, but there is insufficient data to draw firm conclusions on the role of selective neck dissection. Selective and modified radical dissections result in less shoulder disability than radical neck dissection.
CONCLUSIONS: Modified radical neck dissection is supported by pathologic and clinical evidence in N1- and 2-staged disease. There may be a role for selective dissection, but there is a need for more information on oncologic outcome. Prospective multicenter systematic data collection on the outcome of neck dissection is a pragmatic alternative to a trial.
METHODS: A critical evaluation of the literature on the pathologic basis, oncologic effectiveness, and functional outcome of neck dissection.
RESULTS: Pathologic data show preferential metastasis to different lymph node levels, in N0- and N+-staged disease, depending on the primary tumor site. Comparative studies on control of regional metastases suggest that modified radical is no less effective than radical neck dissection, but there is insufficient data to draw firm conclusions on the role of selective neck dissection. Selective and modified radical dissections result in less shoulder disability than radical neck dissection.
CONCLUSIONS: Modified radical neck dissection is supported by pathologic and clinical evidence in N1- and 2-staged disease. There may be a role for selective dissection, but there is a need for more information on oncologic outcome. Prospective multicenter systematic data collection on the outcome of neck dissection is a pragmatic alternative to a trial.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app