We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Incidence of intraoperative flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2002 January
PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of intraoperative flap complications in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and compare the incidence between eyes and between the Hansatome and Automated Corneal Shaper (Bausch & Lomb) microkeratomes.
SETTING: Open-access outpatient excimer laser surgical facility.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was done of 84711 primary LASIK cases performed between November 1998 and May 2000 in 28 national open-access laser facilities. The intraoperative flap complications were identified and categorized into type of complication, eye involved, and microkeratome type. All cases used the Automated Corneal Shaper or the Hansatome microkeratome.
RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-six complications (0.302%) were identified: 29 failures to achieve intraocular pressure (0.034%), 84 partial flaps (0.099%), 59 buttonholes (0.070%), 74 thin or irregular flaps (0.087%), and 10 free flaps (0.012%). There were 134 right eye complications and 122 left eye complications (P =.45). No patient developed an intraoperative flap complication in both eyes. A comparison of Hansatome and Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratomes was possible for the cases performed between December 1999 and May 2000: 46 of 28 201 Hansatome procedures (0.16%) had a complication versus 21 of 329 Automated Corneal Shaper procedures (6.38%). This difference was statistically significant (P <.005).
CONCLUSION: The incidence of intraoperative flap complications during LASIK was acceptably small. The overall complication rate was similar in both eyes. The Hansatome was associated with a lower complication rate than the Automated Corneal Shaper.
SETTING: Open-access outpatient excimer laser surgical facility.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was done of 84711 primary LASIK cases performed between November 1998 and May 2000 in 28 national open-access laser facilities. The intraoperative flap complications were identified and categorized into type of complication, eye involved, and microkeratome type. All cases used the Automated Corneal Shaper or the Hansatome microkeratome.
RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-six complications (0.302%) were identified: 29 failures to achieve intraocular pressure (0.034%), 84 partial flaps (0.099%), 59 buttonholes (0.070%), 74 thin or irregular flaps (0.087%), and 10 free flaps (0.012%). There were 134 right eye complications and 122 left eye complications (P =.45). No patient developed an intraoperative flap complication in both eyes. A comparison of Hansatome and Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratomes was possible for the cases performed between December 1999 and May 2000: 46 of 28 201 Hansatome procedures (0.16%) had a complication versus 21 of 329 Automated Corneal Shaper procedures (6.38%). This difference was statistically significant (P <.005).
CONCLUSION: The incidence of intraoperative flap complications during LASIK was acceptably small. The overall complication rate was similar in both eyes. The Hansatome was associated with a lower complication rate than the Automated Corneal Shaper.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app