We have located links that may give you full text access.
CASE REPORTS
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Limited macular translocation with scleral retraction suture.
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002 April
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Macular translocation with scleral imbrication is a new technique for treating subfoveal choroidal neovascular membranes (CNV). This procedure shortens the sclera but may result in a minimal decrease in the internal circumference of the globe and limits the amount of foveal displacement. The authors propose a new scleral retraction suture aimed at decreasing the internal circumference of the globe in an effort to increase foveal displacement.
METHODS: Using a cadaver model, they compared the amount of scleral shortening using a standard scleral imbrication technique and a modified three suture scleral retraction technique. Sections of the globes were digitised and specialised software was used to estimate the amount of scleral shortening. Three patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation underwent limited macular translocation using pars plana vitrectomy and macular detachment with the modified scleral suture technique. The main outcome measures were visual acuity, foveal displacement, and complications.
RESULTS: In the cadaver model, the scleral retraction suture resulted in a flatter internal scleral fold compared to the standard suture technique and created approximately 890 microm of effective scleral shortening. In the patients who underwent macular translocation and laser photocoagulation of the CNV, visual acuity improved in two patients and worsened in one patient. The range of foveal displacement was 1400-2400 microm.
CONCLUSION: The foveal displacements achieved in this limited study compared to median displacement previously published using standard suture techniques demonstrates that the scleral retraction suture technique may be a useful adjunct to limited macular translocation. The advantage of this type of suture in conjunction with translocation may depend on the effective scleral shortening offered by this retraction suture.
METHODS: Using a cadaver model, they compared the amount of scleral shortening using a standard scleral imbrication technique and a modified three suture scleral retraction technique. Sections of the globes were digitised and specialised software was used to estimate the amount of scleral shortening. Three patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation underwent limited macular translocation using pars plana vitrectomy and macular detachment with the modified scleral suture technique. The main outcome measures were visual acuity, foveal displacement, and complications.
RESULTS: In the cadaver model, the scleral retraction suture resulted in a flatter internal scleral fold compared to the standard suture technique and created approximately 890 microm of effective scleral shortening. In the patients who underwent macular translocation and laser photocoagulation of the CNV, visual acuity improved in two patients and worsened in one patient. The range of foveal displacement was 1400-2400 microm.
CONCLUSION: The foveal displacements achieved in this limited study compared to median displacement previously published using standard suture techniques demonstrates that the scleral retraction suture technique may be a useful adjunct to limited macular translocation. The advantage of this type of suture in conjunction with translocation may depend on the effective scleral shortening offered by this retraction suture.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app