We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Symptom monitoring in childhood asthma: a randomized clinical trial comparing peak expiratory flow rate with symptom monitoring.
Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology 2002 March
BACKGROUND: Accurate symptom evaluation is a critical component of asthma management. Limited data are available about the accuracy of symptom evaluation by children with asthma and their parents, or the impact of various symptom-monitoring strategies on asthma morbidity outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of three different intensities of symptom monitoring on asthma morbidity outcomes.
METHODS: One hundred sixty-eight children (ages 6 to 19) of diverse racial, geographic, and socioeconomic backgrounds were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups (subjective symptom evaluation, symptom-time peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) monitoring, daily PEFR monitoring) in this longitudinal, clinical trial. Outcome measures included a summary asthma severity score, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, symptom days, and health care utilization.
RESULTS: Children who used PEFR meters (PFMs) when symptomatic had a lower asthma severity score, fewer symptom days, and less health care utilization than children in the other two treatment groups. Minority and poor children had the greatest amount of improvement using PFMs when symptomatic. Results were much less striking in white families. Thirty percent of families in the PFM treatment groups discontinued use entirely by 1 year postexit, whereas the majority of families who continued use (94%) used them only when symptomatic to inform symptom interpretation and management decisions.
CONCLUSIONS: Not every child with asthma needs a PFM. Children and families facing extra challenges as a result of illness severity, sociodemographic, or health care system characteristics clearly benefited most from PFM use.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of three different intensities of symptom monitoring on asthma morbidity outcomes.
METHODS: One hundred sixty-eight children (ages 6 to 19) of diverse racial, geographic, and socioeconomic backgrounds were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups (subjective symptom evaluation, symptom-time peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) monitoring, daily PEFR monitoring) in this longitudinal, clinical trial. Outcome measures included a summary asthma severity score, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, symptom days, and health care utilization.
RESULTS: Children who used PEFR meters (PFMs) when symptomatic had a lower asthma severity score, fewer symptom days, and less health care utilization than children in the other two treatment groups. Minority and poor children had the greatest amount of improvement using PFMs when symptomatic. Results were much less striking in white families. Thirty percent of families in the PFM treatment groups discontinued use entirely by 1 year postexit, whereas the majority of families who continued use (94%) used them only when symptomatic to inform symptom interpretation and management decisions.
CONCLUSIONS: Not every child with asthma needs a PFM. Children and families facing extra challenges as a result of illness severity, sociodemographic, or health care system characteristics clearly benefited most from PFM use.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app