We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Extension of breast cancer: comparison of CT and MRI.
Radiation Medicine 2002
PURPOSE: To compare three-dimensional (3D) helical CT with 3D MRI in the evaluation of intraductal spread of breast cancer.
METHODS: Fifty patients with breast cancer were examined. Tumor size ranged from Tis to T2. The whole breast was scanned by both breath-holding helical CT and MRI with contrast media. Linear or segmental enhancement, and spotty enhancement around the main tumor were considered to indicate ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or ductal spread. These findings were compared with thin section histopathologic data.
RESULTS: Seventeen of 35 patients had intraductal spread with invasive cancer and 15 patients had DCIS. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 3D CT in detecting intraductal spread or DCIS were 71.9%, 83.3%, and 76.0%, respectively, and those of 3D MRI were 87.5%, 61.1%, and 78.0%. Overestimations numbered three (6.0%) on CT and seven (14.0%) on MRI, and underestimations numbered nine (18.0%) on CT and four (8.0%) on MRI.
CONCLUSION: 3D helical CT can provide good information about the spread of breast cancer and could be an alternative to 3D MRI for preoperative examination of breast cancer.
METHODS: Fifty patients with breast cancer were examined. Tumor size ranged from Tis to T2. The whole breast was scanned by both breath-holding helical CT and MRI with contrast media. Linear or segmental enhancement, and spotty enhancement around the main tumor were considered to indicate ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or ductal spread. These findings were compared with thin section histopathologic data.
RESULTS: Seventeen of 35 patients had intraductal spread with invasive cancer and 15 patients had DCIS. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 3D CT in detecting intraductal spread or DCIS were 71.9%, 83.3%, and 76.0%, respectively, and those of 3D MRI were 87.5%, 61.1%, and 78.0%. Overestimations numbered three (6.0%) on CT and seven (14.0%) on MRI, and underestimations numbered nine (18.0%) on CT and four (8.0%) on MRI.
CONCLUSION: 3D helical CT can provide good information about the spread of breast cancer and could be an alternative to 3D MRI for preoperative examination of breast cancer.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app