We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Comparative frequency of patch test reactions to topical antibiotics.
British Journal of Dermatology 2002 June
BACKGROUND: Neomycin, clioquinol and fusidic acid are all topical antibiotics widely used in dermatological practice in the U.K., either as a single agent or in combination with topical corticosteroids. However, an adverse effect of topical antibiotics is contact sensitization.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the frequency of positive patch test reactions to fusidic acid, clioquinol and neomycin.
METHODS: To compare the frequency of allergic patch test reactions over 1 year, we patch tested all patients attending the St John's Institute of Dermatology contact dermatitis clinic for one calendar year with fusidic acid, neomycin and clioquinol.
RESULTS: We patch tested 1119 patients. Positive patch test reactions to neomycin were noted in 40 patients (3.6%), compared with eight patients (0.7%) to clioquinol and three patients (0.3%) to fusidic acid. The frequency of medicament allergy to neomycin was thus five times more common than to clioquinol and ten times more common than to fusidic acid. Although fusidic acid is not part of our extended standard series, it is in our medicaments series. Therefore, in the second part of our study, we reviewed all cases of positive patch test reactions to fusidic acid over the last 20 years. We found that the frequency of hypersensitivity has decreased since the early 1980s despite increasing usage; the current average frequency being 1.62 patch-tested patients per year (1.45%) of those patch tested to the medicaments series). The most common diagnosis in such patients was stasis dermatitis (54.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of fusidic acid allergy in an eczema population is low and is comparable with published data from over 10 years ago.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the frequency of positive patch test reactions to fusidic acid, clioquinol and neomycin.
METHODS: To compare the frequency of allergic patch test reactions over 1 year, we patch tested all patients attending the St John's Institute of Dermatology contact dermatitis clinic for one calendar year with fusidic acid, neomycin and clioquinol.
RESULTS: We patch tested 1119 patients. Positive patch test reactions to neomycin were noted in 40 patients (3.6%), compared with eight patients (0.7%) to clioquinol and three patients (0.3%) to fusidic acid. The frequency of medicament allergy to neomycin was thus five times more common than to clioquinol and ten times more common than to fusidic acid. Although fusidic acid is not part of our extended standard series, it is in our medicaments series. Therefore, in the second part of our study, we reviewed all cases of positive patch test reactions to fusidic acid over the last 20 years. We found that the frequency of hypersensitivity has decreased since the early 1980s despite increasing usage; the current average frequency being 1.62 patch-tested patients per year (1.45%) of those patch tested to the medicaments series). The most common diagnosis in such patients was stasis dermatitis (54.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of fusidic acid allergy in an eczema population is low and is comparable with published data from over 10 years ago.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: From History to Practice of a Secular Topic.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 5
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app