We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Quantification of lung microvascular injury with ultrasound.
Annals of Biomedical Engineering 2002 May
Quantification of water and solute exchange rates across the lung microvascular barrier (LMB) may be an important early-warning indicator of pulmonary microvascular diseases such as acute respiratory distress syndrome. Our objective was to determine the degree to which osmotic water movement across the LMB induced by injection of hypertonic solutions of NaCl and glucose could be detected downstream from the lung with a specialized ultrasonic velocity (USV) transducer manufactured by Transonic Systems. We hypothesized that mathematical modeling of the osmotic transients (OT) would yield estimates of osmotic exchange parameters that were sensitive to microvascular injury. Two groups of six dogs were studied under baseline conditions and after injury with high dose (HD) or low dose (LD) oleic acid. Osmotic conductances (sigmaK(1), sigmaK(2)), and volumes (V(1), V(2)) of two extravascular spaces were estimated by fitting the mathematical model to the OT data. HD results (mean +/- standard error) indicated a significant decrease (by paired t test) in sigmaK(1) from 1.59 +/- 0.09 to 1.04 +/- 0.015 [ml h(-1) (mosm/l)(-1) g(-1) WLW)], an increase in sigmaK(2) from 0.20 +/- 0.08 to 0.32 +/- 0.12 [ml h(-1) (mosm/l)(-1) g(-1)], and a significant increase in V2 from 23.26 +/- 2.51 to 78.0 +/- 15.23 (ml) for NaCl injections. LD V2 estimated from NaCl increased significantly from 21.57 +/- 2.15 to 37.59 +/- 2.36 (ml), sigmaK2 increased from 0.09 +/- 0.03 to 0.17 +/- 0.04 and no significant change in sigmaK(1) was found. Baseline glucose sigmaK(1), sigmaK(2), and V1 in the LD series were 2.08 +/- 0.18, 0.64 +/- 0.19 [ml h(-1) (mosm/l)(-1) g(-1)] and 13.08 +/- 1.89 (ml), respectively, and did not change significantly with injury. We conclude that OT data measured by USV is a sensitive and informative indicator of LMB osmotic properties, and may be useful for quantification of LMB permeability changes due to acute injury. We further conclude that V(1) represents microvascular endothelial volume and V(2) is an estimate of interstitial volume.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Anti-Arrhythmic Effects of Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Their Role in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: From Beta-Blockers to Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Beyond.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 Februrary 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app