Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Myeloid disorders with deletion of 5q as the sole karyotypic abnormality: the clinical and pathologic spectrum.

The 5q-syndrome has been recognized as a distinct subtype of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with characteristic clinical and pathologic features. Nevertheless, the definition of this syndrome is imprecise. To better understand how the 5q-syndrome is related to other "5q- only" myeloid disorders, we searched our conventional cytogenetics file for cases with 5q- as the sole karyotypic abnormality. 31 cases of "5q- only" myeloid disorders were found, and they were refractory anemia (n = 16), refractory anemia with excess blasts (RAEB) (n = 5), RAEB in transformation (n = 1), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n = 1) and acute myeloid leukemia (n = 8). They included 15 men and 16 women, with a median age of 67 years (range, 40-84 years). The marrow blast count was < or = 11% in 22 cases and > or = 25% in the remaining nine cases. The following morphologic features were common in the marrow: megakaryocytic hypolobation (30/31, 97%), erythroid hypoplasia (26/31, 84%), basophilia (19/31, 62%) and eosinophilia (16/31, 52%). Of those with < or = 11% blasts, 7/22 cases met the criteria of the 5q-syndrome, as defined by high mean corpuscle volume (MCV), normal/high platelet counts, and megakaryocytic hypolobation. Except for the two defining parameters for the 5q-syndrome (MCV and platelet count), there was no significant difference in hematologic parameters between the 5q-syndrome and other cases with < or = 11% blasts. Furthermore, no significant difference in the chromosomal breakpoints or survival was found between these two groups. We conclude that "5q- only" MDS show consistent morphologic features, suggesting a common pathogenesis related to their similar cytogenetic abnormality. In "5q- only" MDS with < or = 11% marrow blasts, strict application of the conventional criteria of the 5q-syndrome may not be necessary in predicting the overall prognosis.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app