COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Agreement between CSF flow dynamics in MRI and ICP monitoring in the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus. Sensitivity and specificity of CSF dynamics to predict outcome.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were 1) to assess the degree of agreement between CSF flow dynamics determined by MR and ICP monitoring in the diagnosis of NPH, and 2) to determine the sensitivity and specificity of CSF flow dynamics studied by MR in predicting improvement after shunting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out in 35 consecutive patients with suspected NPH. CSF velocity (Phase Contrast) through the aqueduct was determined in sagittal plane. Patients were classified as "normal" or hyperdynamic in comparison with a control group of 27 healthy volunteers. Continuous extradural ICP monitoring was performed for at least 72 hours and patients were classified as having active, compensated, or ex-vacuo hydrocephalus. Patients with active or compensated hydrocephalus were shunted.

RESULTS: The degree of agreement between MR dynamics and ICP monitoring was 82%. Sensitivity of CSF velocity was 90% and specificity was 50%.

CONCLUSIONS: The degree of agreement between ICP monitoring and CSF velocity is high. High CSF velocity through the aqueduct is a good predictor of improvement after surgery. However, patients with normal velocity in MR required additional tests before a diagnosis of NPH is ruled out.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app