Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Extensor tendon repair: mobilise or splint?

Chirurgie de la Main 2003 Februrary
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the static and dynamic hand therapy regimes used at Mount Vernon Hospital, following extensor tendon injury during 1995-2000 and compare them to the early active regimes published.

METHODS: Sixty-five patients were included and their hand function recorded by calculating total active motion (TAM), percentage combined motion and extensor lag at 4-6 weeks and at 10 weeks postinjury.

RESULTS: The results in two groups were good, with mean TAMs of 202 and 258 at 4-6 weeks and at 10 weeks, respectively, for the static regime and 214 and 245, respectively, for the dynamic regime, during the same time periods.

CONCLUSION: The results from each group compare favourably with the published series of patients undergoing early active motion, where mobilisation is commenced almost immediately. The authors' preference is the static regime as it is simple, effective and particularly useful in poorly compliant patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app