We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Overwork weakness in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence of overwork weakness in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT).
DESIGN: Prospective survey.
SETTING: Rehabilitation department for CMT in an Italian tertiary care hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 106 outpatients with CMT, selected for absence of other causes of weakness (age range, 11-69y), and 48 healthy volunteers (controls).
INTERVENTIONS: The strength of 2 intrinsic hand muscles (abductor pollicis brevis [APB], first dorsal interosseous) in the dominant and nondominant hands was graded by using manual muscle testing and a modified Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The side of the stronger muscle and the difference in strength between the nondominant and dominant muscles.
RESULTS: Muscles were stronger on the nondominant side in 65.57% of patients versus 1.04% of controls, and on the dominant side in .94% of patients versus 84.38% controls. The difference in strength for first dorsal interosseous was .51 in patients and -.32 in controls (P>.01). The difference in strength for APB was .65 in patients and -.35 in controls (P>.01).
CONCLUSIONS: CMT muscles in the dominant hand are weaker than in the nondominant hand. This may be the result of overwork weakness.
DESIGN: Prospective survey.
SETTING: Rehabilitation department for CMT in an Italian tertiary care hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 106 outpatients with CMT, selected for absence of other causes of weakness (age range, 11-69y), and 48 healthy volunteers (controls).
INTERVENTIONS: The strength of 2 intrinsic hand muscles (abductor pollicis brevis [APB], first dorsal interosseous) in the dominant and nondominant hands was graded by using manual muscle testing and a modified Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The side of the stronger muscle and the difference in strength between the nondominant and dominant muscles.
RESULTS: Muscles were stronger on the nondominant side in 65.57% of patients versus 1.04% of controls, and on the dominant side in .94% of patients versus 84.38% controls. The difference in strength for first dorsal interosseous was .51 in patients and -.32 in controls (P>.01). The difference in strength for APB was .65 in patients and -.35 in controls (P>.01).
CONCLUSIONS: CMT muscles in the dominant hand are weaker than in the nondominant hand. This may be the result of overwork weakness.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app