Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Clinical response of hard tissue replacement (HTR) polymer as an implant material in oral surgery patients.

This study evaluated the performance of a synthetic implant material, Hard Tissue Replacement Polymer, for: (1) ease of handling, (2) compatibility with bone and soft tissue, (3) stability of augmentation over time, and (4) development of untoward effects. HTR (a registered trademark of HTR Sciences, a division of United States Surgical Corporation, Norwalk, CT 06856) was implanted into 34 patients by means of five different surgical procedures. The material was found to be easy to manipulate during surgery. Tissue and bone compatibility, defined as absence of inflammation, was present in 32/34 surgical sites (94%). In extraction sites during the 18-month follow-up, no measurable decrease in bone height or width was seen. One patient with a large periodontal endodontic defect developed a post-operative infection necessitating extraction of the tooth. No induction of bone was seen in response to placement of HTR material.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app