We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Clinicopathologic findings from lacrimal sac biopsy specimens obtained during dacryocystorhinostomy.
PURPOSE: To retrospectively review the pathologic diagnoses and clinical characteristics of patients undergoing dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).
METHODS: Specimens accessioned between 1991 and 2001 in a single ophthalmic pathology laboratory were reviewed. All of the specimens included a lacrimal sac biopsy specimen. The pathologic diagnoses were recorded. The clinical features of the patients with significant pathologic abnormalities were reviewed to determine if the pathology was suspected before or at the time of the DCR.
RESULTS: There were 377 DCR specimens from 316 patients representing 1.8% of 21,018 ophthalmic pathology specimens accessioned between 1991 and 2001. Diagnoses, in decreasing order of frequency, were nongranulomatous inflammation (321, 85.1%), granulomatous inflammation consistent with sarcoidosis (8, 2.1%), lymphoma (7, 1.9%), papilloma (4, 1.11%), lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate (4, 1.1%), transitional cell carcinoma (2, 0.5%), and single cases of adenocarcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, granular cell tumor, plasmacytoma, and leukemic infiltrate. A total of 31 (8.2%) specimens from 25 (7.9%) of patients demonstrated significant pathology. Among 17 specimens (4.5%) from 14 patients with neoplasms whose clinical histories were available, 8 (2.1%) were not suspected before surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Nongranulomatous inflammation consistent with chronic dacryocystitis is the most common diagnosis in lacrimal sac specimens obtained at DCR. Neoplasms resulting in chronic nasolacrimal duct obstruction occurred in 4.6% of cases and were unsuspected before surgery in 2.1% of patients. We recommend pathologic examination of DCR specimens.
METHODS: Specimens accessioned between 1991 and 2001 in a single ophthalmic pathology laboratory were reviewed. All of the specimens included a lacrimal sac biopsy specimen. The pathologic diagnoses were recorded. The clinical features of the patients with significant pathologic abnormalities were reviewed to determine if the pathology was suspected before or at the time of the DCR.
RESULTS: There were 377 DCR specimens from 316 patients representing 1.8% of 21,018 ophthalmic pathology specimens accessioned between 1991 and 2001. Diagnoses, in decreasing order of frequency, were nongranulomatous inflammation (321, 85.1%), granulomatous inflammation consistent with sarcoidosis (8, 2.1%), lymphoma (7, 1.9%), papilloma (4, 1.11%), lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate (4, 1.1%), transitional cell carcinoma (2, 0.5%), and single cases of adenocarcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, granular cell tumor, plasmacytoma, and leukemic infiltrate. A total of 31 (8.2%) specimens from 25 (7.9%) of patients demonstrated significant pathology. Among 17 specimens (4.5%) from 14 patients with neoplasms whose clinical histories were available, 8 (2.1%) were not suspected before surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Nongranulomatous inflammation consistent with chronic dacryocystitis is the most common diagnosis in lacrimal sac specimens obtained at DCR. Neoplasms resulting in chronic nasolacrimal duct obstruction occurred in 4.6% of cases and were unsuspected before surgery in 2.1% of patients. We recommend pathologic examination of DCR specimens.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app