Appropriateness of hysterectomies performed for multiple preoperative indications.

OBJECTIVE: To correlate the listing of multiple preoperative indications for hysterectomy with the risk of non-confirmation of the preoperative diagnosis.

METHODS: Records of 171 women undergoing consecutive hysterectomies for all indications at a large teaching hospital were reviewed for preoperative indication(s), compliance with published preoperative validation criteria for cases in which tissue pathology was not expected, and histologic verification of the preoperative diagnosis for cases in which tissue pathology was expected. Rates of confirmation (histologic verification plus successful compliance with validation criteria) of the preoperative diagnosis were compared between subgroups of cases in which single indications were listed (N = 124) or multiple indications were listed (N = 47) preoperatively.

RESULTS: The rate of confirmation of single indications (115 of 124 cases, 93%) was significantly higher than the rate of confirmation of even one indication in cases in which multiple indications were listed (28 of 47 cases, 60%, P < .0001; relative risk for non-confirmation of multiple indications = 1.55). Multiple indications were more likely to be listed when tissue pathology was not expected, representing 49% of validatable indications as compared with only 18% of histologically verifiable indications (P < .0001). Overall, the rate of compliance with validation criteria (70%) was significantly lower than the rate of histologic verification (90%) (P < .01).

CONCLUSION: These data suggest that listing of multiple preoperative indications for hysterectomy is associated with both decreased appropriateness, as reflected in decreased compliance with generally accepted preoperative validation criteria, and decreased diagnostic accuracy, as reflected in lower rates of histologic verification.