We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Review
Thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: does it work?
Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 1992 December
BACKGROUND: This article is presented to provoke further discussion regarding the use of thrombolytic drugs to treat acute ischemic stroke.
SUMMARY OF REVIEW: Overview analysis of the six randomized trials of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke available in the world literature shows a 20% increase in the odds of death and a 30% reduction in the odds of death or deterioration (both with wide confidence intervals, neither result significant) after thrombolytic treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Exclusion of the two trials conducted without the benefit of computed tomographic scanning shows a 37% reduction in the odds of death (95% confidence interval, 74% reduction to 40% excess) and a significant reduction of 56% in the odds of death or deterioration after thrombolytic treatment (95% confidence interval, 20-76% reduction; 2p = 0.007). Analysis of all published studies (randomized and nonrandomized) shows that there does not appear to be an excess risk of hemorrhagic transformation of the cerebral infarct or of severe edema formation.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe the present evidence is sufficiently encouraging to warrant proper testing of thrombolysis in sufficiently large and well-designed randomized clinical trials to influence clinical practice.
SUMMARY OF REVIEW: Overview analysis of the six randomized trials of thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke available in the world literature shows a 20% increase in the odds of death and a 30% reduction in the odds of death or deterioration (both with wide confidence intervals, neither result significant) after thrombolytic treatment for acute ischemic stroke. Exclusion of the two trials conducted without the benefit of computed tomographic scanning shows a 37% reduction in the odds of death (95% confidence interval, 74% reduction to 40% excess) and a significant reduction of 56% in the odds of death or deterioration after thrombolytic treatment (95% confidence interval, 20-76% reduction; 2p = 0.007). Analysis of all published studies (randomized and nonrandomized) shows that there does not appear to be an excess risk of hemorrhagic transformation of the cerebral infarct or of severe edema formation.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe the present evidence is sufficiently encouraging to warrant proper testing of thrombolysis in sufficiently large and well-designed randomized clinical trials to influence clinical practice.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app