We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
The histologic differentiation of oral condyloma acuminatum from its mimics.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine which histologic features could enable one to distinguish oral condyloma, as defined by the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA through in situ hybridization, from its mimics.
STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-two paraffin-embedded specimens from 28 patients that were clinically suggestive of oral condyloma were analyzed histologically and through in situ hybridization with a consensus HPV probe.
RESULTS: HPV DNA was detected in 17/32 (53%) of the lesions; no additional positive cases were detected after polymerase chain reaction amplification. Only 5 of the 17 virus-positive cases were considered to be histopathologically unequivocal for condyloma. The histologic features significantly associated with HPV detection were nonuniform perinuclear halos, often in association with epithelial crevices (P =.02), and papillomatosis (P =.02). Each of the 17 patients who were HPV-positive had either HPV-6 or HPV-11, a finding that is similar to those for condyloma involving the penis and vulva/vagina.
CONCLUSION: Differentiation between oral condyloma and its mimics is best accomplished by using a combination of histologic, clinical, and in situ viral studies.
STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-two paraffin-embedded specimens from 28 patients that were clinically suggestive of oral condyloma were analyzed histologically and through in situ hybridization with a consensus HPV probe.
RESULTS: HPV DNA was detected in 17/32 (53%) of the lesions; no additional positive cases were detected after polymerase chain reaction amplification. Only 5 of the 17 virus-positive cases were considered to be histopathologically unequivocal for condyloma. The histologic features significantly associated with HPV detection were nonuniform perinuclear halos, often in association with epithelial crevices (P =.02), and papillomatosis (P =.02). Each of the 17 patients who were HPV-positive had either HPV-6 or HPV-11, a finding that is similar to those for condyloma involving the penis and vulva/vagina.
CONCLUSION: Differentiation between oral condyloma and its mimics is best accomplished by using a combination of histologic, clinical, and in situ viral studies.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app