Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Is membrane extraction in cases of exudative age-related macular degeneration still up-to-date? A 4-year résumé.

BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a frequent cause of an irreversible loss of the ability to read. The non-exudative form of AMD has not been therapeutically approached in the past in contrast to the exudative form with choroidal neovascularizations (CNVs). Parafoveal laser coagulation can be applied, and in cases of subfoveal location a pars plana vitrectomy with subretinal resection of the CNV is possible.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: Since 1995, we have operated 46 eyes of 45 patients with CNV developing from AMD. Patient ages ranged from 63 to 85 years (mean 71.8 years). Pre- and postoperatively we performed vision tests, fluorescence angiographies with sodium fluorescein and indocyanine green. Follow-up times ranged from 3 to 28 months (mean 12.3 months).

RESULTS: Pre-operative vision was 0.10 (range: hand movements to 0.4). Postoperative vision at the end of the follow-up period was 0.12 (range: hand movements to 0.4). Vision at the end of the follow-up was lower in 41%, unchanged in 20% and improved in 39%. In 43 eyes, a non-exudative form of AMD developed. Two eyes had a recurrent CNV, which was removed successfully with a second pars plana vitrectomy. Three patients developed a retinal detachment, which was successfully treated by pars plana vitrectomy, encircling buckle and gas tamponade.

CONCLUSIONS: We still have to wait for the results of the photodynamic study trials and a randomized study of macular dislocation. Subretinal removal of the CNV by pars plana vitrectomy allows a stabilization of the visual function in most of our cases of AMD. This method inhibits the development of large pseudotumour-like scars. Postoperatively remaining pigment epithelial defects with choroidal atrophies however limit a visual rehabilitation so that reading vision can only be achieved in cases with good pre-operative vision. Long-term results of photodynamic therapy are still lacking and have to show its effectiveness over greater time spans.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app