We have located links that may give you full text access.
CASE REPORTS
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Central neuromodulation in chronic migraine patients with suboccipital stimulators: a PET study.
Brain 2004 January
Electrical stimulation of primary sensory afferents is known to have an antinociceptive effect. Animal and functional imaging studies suggest a role for supraspinal structures in this response. Eight patients with chronic migraine (> or =15 days per month of attacks of migraine without aura), who had shown a marked beneficial response to implanted bilateral suboccipital stimulators, were studied. Stimulation evoked local paraesthesia, the presence of which was a criterion of pain relief. On stimulation, the headache began to improve instantaneously and was completely suppressed within 30 min. On switching off the stimulation, the headache recurred instantly and peaked within 20 min. PET scans were performed using regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) as a marker of neuronal activity. Each patient was scanned in the following three states: (1) stimulator at optimum settings: patient pain-free but with paraesthesia; (2) stimulator off: patient in pain and no paraesthesia; (3) stimulator partially activated: patient with intermediate levels of pain and paraesthesia. All scans were processed and analysed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) 99. There were significant changes in rCBF in the dorsal rostral pons, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and cuneus, correlated to pain scores, and in the ACC and left pulvinar, correlated to stimulation-induced paraesthesia scores. The activation pattern in the dorsal rostral pons is highly suggestive of a role for this structure in the pathophysiology of chronic migraine. The localization and persistence of activity during stimulation is exactly consistent with a region activated in episodic migraine, and with the persistence of activation of that area after successful treatment. The dorsal rostral pons may be a locus of neuromodulation by suboccipital stimulation. In addition, suboccipital stimulation modulated activity in the left pulvinar.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app