We have located links that may give you full text access.
Hysteroscopic endometrial ablation using the rollerball electrode.
Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992 September
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of hysteroscopic endometrial ablation with the rollerball resectoscope.
METHODS: From April 1989 to March 1991, 64 women underwent hysteroscopic endometrial ablation using electrosurgery. Telephone follow-up was obtained for 61 patients at least 6 months after the procedure. The majority of patients requested endometrial ablation because of irregular heavy menses, and two patients presented with postmenopausal bleeding. All patients had preoperative endometrial sampling that demonstrated benign endometrial histology. Five women had previous endometrial ablation with the Nd:YAG laser, with persistent bleeding. Eight patients had endometrial polyps and six had submucous fibroids that were resected at the time of hysteroscopic ablation.
RESULTS: The average operative time was 31.6 minutes, and an average of 304 mL of distending medium was absorbed during the procedure. Complications included one uterine perforation in a patient who had a previous Nd:YAG ablation, and one epidural anesthetic complication. At follow-up, 18 women (29.5%) reported amenorrhea, 16 (26.2%) reported spotting, 21 (34.4%) reported decreased menstrual flow, four (6.6%) had no change, and two (3.3%) noted increased flow. Subjectively, 49 patients (80.3%) reported a satisfactory outcome. Of the 12 who were not satisfied, seven underwent a repeat ablation with satisfactory results, four chose hysterectomy, and one elected not to have further therapy.
CONCLUSION: Endometrial ablation with the rollerball electrode is a safe, excellent method of management in women with excessive menstrual flow and provides a cost-effective, minimally invasive alternative to hysterectomy.
METHODS: From April 1989 to March 1991, 64 women underwent hysteroscopic endometrial ablation using electrosurgery. Telephone follow-up was obtained for 61 patients at least 6 months after the procedure. The majority of patients requested endometrial ablation because of irregular heavy menses, and two patients presented with postmenopausal bleeding. All patients had preoperative endometrial sampling that demonstrated benign endometrial histology. Five women had previous endometrial ablation with the Nd:YAG laser, with persistent bleeding. Eight patients had endometrial polyps and six had submucous fibroids that were resected at the time of hysteroscopic ablation.
RESULTS: The average operative time was 31.6 minutes, and an average of 304 mL of distending medium was absorbed during the procedure. Complications included one uterine perforation in a patient who had a previous Nd:YAG ablation, and one epidural anesthetic complication. At follow-up, 18 women (29.5%) reported amenorrhea, 16 (26.2%) reported spotting, 21 (34.4%) reported decreased menstrual flow, four (6.6%) had no change, and two (3.3%) noted increased flow. Subjectively, 49 patients (80.3%) reported a satisfactory outcome. Of the 12 who were not satisfied, seven underwent a repeat ablation with satisfactory results, four chose hysterectomy, and one elected not to have further therapy.
CONCLUSION: Endometrial ablation with the rollerball electrode is a safe, excellent method of management in women with excessive menstrual flow and provides a cost-effective, minimally invasive alternative to hysterectomy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app