We have located links that may give you full text access.
Neonatal morphometry. Relation to obstetric, pediatric, and menstrual estimates of gestational age.
American Journal of Diseases of Children 1992 July
OBJECTIVE: To determine gestational age-dependent neonatal morphometrics based on last menstrual periods (LMPs), Ballard examinations, and obstetric estimates of gestational age.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional survey of 38,818 live-born neonates at a tertiary care center in Detroit, Mich.
SELECTION PROCEDURES: Consecutive sample of all viable, structurally normal, singleton neonates delivered at Hutzel Hospital from 1984 through 1991.
MEASUREMENTS/MAIN RESULTS: Neonatal weights, lengths, and head circumferences were recorded at birth. Gestational age-dependent morphometrics were based solely on LMPs and compared with those based on obstetric estimates (using LMPs corrected by fetal ultrasound). Ballard examination had an 85.4% concurrence (within 14 days) with obstetric estimates of gestational age, but only a 69.9% (P less than .0001) agreement with LMP. Dating only by LMP significantly overestimated the prevalence of prematurity (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 99% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 1.4) and postmaturity (OR, 5.0; 99% CI, 4.6 to 5.4), distorting apparent growth patterns, especially for preterm neonates. In contrast to previous studies based solely on LMPs, morphometric measurements increased beyond 40 weeks when dated by obstetric estimates.
CONCLUSIONS: Gestational age-dependent neonatal morphometrics should not be based solely on LMPs.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional survey of 38,818 live-born neonates at a tertiary care center in Detroit, Mich.
SELECTION PROCEDURES: Consecutive sample of all viable, structurally normal, singleton neonates delivered at Hutzel Hospital from 1984 through 1991.
MEASUREMENTS/MAIN RESULTS: Neonatal weights, lengths, and head circumferences were recorded at birth. Gestational age-dependent morphometrics were based solely on LMPs and compared with those based on obstetric estimates (using LMPs corrected by fetal ultrasound). Ballard examination had an 85.4% concurrence (within 14 days) with obstetric estimates of gestational age, but only a 69.9% (P less than .0001) agreement with LMP. Dating only by LMP significantly overestimated the prevalence of prematurity (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 99% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 1.4) and postmaturity (OR, 5.0; 99% CI, 4.6 to 5.4), distorting apparent growth patterns, especially for preterm neonates. In contrast to previous studies based solely on LMPs, morphometric measurements increased beyond 40 weeks when dated by obstetric estimates.
CONCLUSIONS: Gestational age-dependent neonatal morphometrics should not be based solely on LMPs.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app