We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Subjective and objective analysis of the prevalence of Peyronie's disease in a population of men presenting for prostate cancer screening.
Journal of Urology 2004 June
PURPOSE: In this study we defined the prevalence of Peyronie's disease in a cohort of men being screened for prostate cancer in the United States. The association between Peyronie's disease, and medical comorbidities and patient self-reported erectile dysfunction was also defined.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 534 men presenting to 1 of 3 prostate cancer screening centers provided a complete medical history, underwent physical examination performed in all by a urologist and completed the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) questionnaire. This population was chosen because of the access to a large number of subjects combined with the fact that subjects were not presenting with a specific urological complaint. The diagnosis of Peyronie's disease was based on a palpable penile plaque. Data were assessed using univariate analysis, multivariate logistic regression and Pearson chi-square analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were found to have a palpable penile plaque on physical examination for a prevalence rate of 8.9%. The mean age of men with Peyronie's disease was 68.2 years compared to a mean of 61.8 years in men without Peyronie's disease (p <0.0001). On univariate analysis hypertension (p = 0.02) and diabetes (p = 0.007) were present with significantly increased frequency in patients with Peyronie's disease. Patients diagnosed with Peyronie's disease had significantly lower values for responses to each of the 5 questions on the SHIM survey. An increase in age and decrease in total SHIM score remained significantly associated with a greater probability of Peyronie's disease on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: We found the prevalence of Peyronie's disease to be greater than in most previously reported series. We also noted a significant association between Peyronie's disease aging, hypertension, diabetes and self-reported erectile dysfunction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 534 men presenting to 1 of 3 prostate cancer screening centers provided a complete medical history, underwent physical examination performed in all by a urologist and completed the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) questionnaire. This population was chosen because of the access to a large number of subjects combined with the fact that subjects were not presenting with a specific urological complaint. The diagnosis of Peyronie's disease was based on a palpable penile plaque. Data were assessed using univariate analysis, multivariate logistic regression and Pearson chi-square analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were found to have a palpable penile plaque on physical examination for a prevalence rate of 8.9%. The mean age of men with Peyronie's disease was 68.2 years compared to a mean of 61.8 years in men without Peyronie's disease (p <0.0001). On univariate analysis hypertension (p = 0.02) and diabetes (p = 0.007) were present with significantly increased frequency in patients with Peyronie's disease. Patients diagnosed with Peyronie's disease had significantly lower values for responses to each of the 5 questions on the SHIM survey. An increase in age and decrease in total SHIM score remained significantly associated with a greater probability of Peyronie's disease on multivariate analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: We found the prevalence of Peyronie's disease to be greater than in most previously reported series. We also noted a significant association between Peyronie's disease aging, hypertension, diabetes and self-reported erectile dysfunction.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app