[Complications of vacuum extractor deliveries].

OBJECTIVES: To describe maternal and neonatal complications following deliveries assisted by vacuum extraction and to compare outcomes with those obtained after spontaneous vaginal delivery. We wanted to know if vacuum extractor was a risk factor by itself.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of two years activity involving 4524 deliveries of which 845 (18.7%) were vacuum extractor assisted. We precisely defined maternal and neonatal complications to compare their rates in spontaneous vaginal delivery and vacuum extractor groups.

RESULTS: There were 1333 maternal complications and 114 neonatal complications. The adjusted risks of maternal complications were significantly higher in the vacuum extractor group for simple vaginal tears (OR=3.0; p<0.001), the simple perineal tears (OR=1.8; p<0.001) and third degree perineal tears (OR=2.7; p<0.01). For neonatal complications, the difference was significant for cephalhematomas (OR=10; p<0.001) and scalp abrasions (OR=53; p<0.001). No cases of skull fracture or subgaleal subaponeurotic hemorrhage were recorded.

CONCLUSION: Our rates of maternal and neonatal complications after vacuum extractor were similar to those described in the literature. We have been able to show that vacuum extraction is itself a risk factor for third degree perineal tears and cephalhematoma. However, these complications are so infrequent that the advantages of this method of extraction argue in favor of wide use in obstetrics.