We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Photodynamic therapy with verteporfin for subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: results of an effectiveness study.
Archives of Ophthalmology 2004 June
OBJECTIVE: To determine the postapproval effectiveness of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin for the treatment of predominantly classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration.
METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients treated with PDT for subfoveal CNV were compared with an untreated historical control group. Control patients had subfoveal CNV and were first seen by us within 1 year before Health Canada's approval of verteporfin. Both groups were followed up for the development of significant visual loss, stability, or improvement. Multivariate models were constructed to evaluate the effectiveness of PDT, controlling for multiple covariates (age, sex, baseline visual acuity, follow-up time, lesion size, and number of treatments).
RESULTS: Significant differences were noted in the change in visual acuity between those who did and did not receive PDT (chi(2) = 5.9, P =.048). Patients who received PDT were 2.9 times (95% confidence interval, 0.9-9.1) less likely to develop a moderate (>2 lines) visual loss (chi(2) = 3.2, P =.07). Controlling for covariates, patients who received PDT were 13.7 times (95% confidence interval, 1.4-132.6) more likely to develop a visual improvement of at least 1 line.
CONCLUSION: Compared with historical controls, PDT was demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of predominantly classic subfoveal CNV.
METHODS: Forty-five consecutive patients treated with PDT for subfoveal CNV were compared with an untreated historical control group. Control patients had subfoveal CNV and were first seen by us within 1 year before Health Canada's approval of verteporfin. Both groups were followed up for the development of significant visual loss, stability, or improvement. Multivariate models were constructed to evaluate the effectiveness of PDT, controlling for multiple covariates (age, sex, baseline visual acuity, follow-up time, lesion size, and number of treatments).
RESULTS: Significant differences were noted in the change in visual acuity between those who did and did not receive PDT (chi(2) = 5.9, P =.048). Patients who received PDT were 2.9 times (95% confidence interval, 0.9-9.1) less likely to develop a moderate (>2 lines) visual loss (chi(2) = 3.2, P =.07). Controlling for covariates, patients who received PDT were 13.7 times (95% confidence interval, 1.4-132.6) more likely to develop a visual improvement of at least 1 line.
CONCLUSION: Compared with historical controls, PDT was demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of predominantly classic subfoveal CNV.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app