Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of open versus closed reduction of intraarticular calcaneal fractures: a matched cohort in workmen.

Seventeen displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures treated operatively were matched with 17 nonoperatively treated displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures among Workers' Compensation Board patients. Matching criteria included type of fracture, age, year of injury, and occupation. After follow-up averaging 6.3 years and 5.4 years, respectively, no significant differences existed between the two groups in heel pain, subtalar motion, and return to work. However, in those fractures treated operatively, the overall clinical result was better when an anatomic reduction of the subtalar joint was achieved.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app