We have located links that may give you full text access.
The relationship of the umbilicus to the aortic bifurcation: implications for laparoscopic technique.
Obstetrics and Gynecology 1992 July
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the location of the umbilicus relative to the aortic bifurcation and the left common iliac vein where it crosses the midline.
METHODS: Abdominal computed tomography images from 35 reproductive-age women were retrospectively reviewed to determine the location of the umbilicus. The results were correlated with body mass index using Pearson correlation coefficient and a two-tailed paired t test.
RESULTS: The location of the umbilicus, but not the aortic bifurcation, was more caudal in heavier women and negatively correlated with body mass index. In nonobese women, the mean location of the umbilicus was 0.4 cm caudal to the aortic bifurcation, and was at or cephalad to the bifurcation in eight of 15 (53%). In overweight women, the mean umbilical location was 2.4 cm caudal to the bifurcation, and in obese women, 2.9 cm caudal to the bifurcation. In the last two groups of subjects, the umbilicus was located at the level of the bifurcation in six of 20 (30%). In every case, the umbilicus was located cephalad to where the common iliac vein crossed the midline.
CONCLUSIONS: The umbilicus is often located at or cephalad to the aortic bifurcation, and consistently located cephalad to where the left common iliac vein crosses the midline. The laparoscopic approach should take these relationships into account to minimize injuries to major retroperitoneal vessels.
METHODS: Abdominal computed tomography images from 35 reproductive-age women were retrospectively reviewed to determine the location of the umbilicus. The results were correlated with body mass index using Pearson correlation coefficient and a two-tailed paired t test.
RESULTS: The location of the umbilicus, but not the aortic bifurcation, was more caudal in heavier women and negatively correlated with body mass index. In nonobese women, the mean location of the umbilicus was 0.4 cm caudal to the aortic bifurcation, and was at or cephalad to the bifurcation in eight of 15 (53%). In overweight women, the mean umbilical location was 2.4 cm caudal to the bifurcation, and in obese women, 2.9 cm caudal to the bifurcation. In the last two groups of subjects, the umbilicus was located at the level of the bifurcation in six of 20 (30%). In every case, the umbilicus was located cephalad to where the common iliac vein crossed the midline.
CONCLUSIONS: The umbilicus is often located at or cephalad to the aortic bifurcation, and consistently located cephalad to where the left common iliac vein crosses the midline. The laparoscopic approach should take these relationships into account to minimize injuries to major retroperitoneal vessels.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app