COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance pattern comparisons among bloodstream infection isolates from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997-2002).

The empiric treatment of patients with bloodstream infections (BSI) has become more complicated in an era of increasing antimicrobial resistance. The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program has monitored BSI from patients in medical centers worldwide since 1997. During 1997-2002, a total of 81,213 BSI pathogens from North America, Latin America, and Europe were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility. S. aureus, E. coli, and coagulase-negative staphylococci were the three most common BSI pathogens in all three regions each year. Prevalence variability was noted in regions for some species, including higher rates of isolation of E. coli in Europe, Enterococcus spp. in North America, and Gram-negative enteric and nonenteric species in Latin America. Patient age analysis showed the most common BSI pathogen among neonates was coagulase-negative staphylococci and among elderly patients, E. coli. Resistance among BSI pathogens was much more prevalent in nosocomial infections and in patients in intensive care units (ICUs); age differences were also noted. Geographically, oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (39.1%, 2002) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (17.7%, 2002) were highest in North America, and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella spp. (35.8-46.7%) and multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa (18.7%, 2002) were highest in Latin America. Activity of commonly used antimicrobial agents remained relatively stable in North America, except in the case of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (20% decline between 1997 and 2002). An epidemiologic investigation of oxacillin-resistant S. aureus in North America identified 10 significant clones (ribotypes) and the common resistance patterns associated with them. Surveillance of BSI pathogens is needed to determine trends of resistance and provide useful information regarding patient risk factors and geographic differences.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app