English Abstract
Journal Article
Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Neuromuscular effects of superimposed and combined transcutaneous electrical stimulation with voluntary activity: a review].

With voluntary muscular contraction (VOL), small motor units (MUs) are recruited before large MUs are (a submaximal muscular contraction recruits only small MUs), whereas electrical stimulation (ES) tends to reverse the recruitment order. On the basis of this observation, some authors have tested the physiological effects of ES superimposed simultaneously with VOL (superimposed technique [ST]) or separately (combined technique [CT]). With healthy subjects, ST does not recruit more MUs than VOL, except with eccentric contractions. After health subjects undergo training programs, ST appears to be as efficient as VOL in enhancing subjects' neuromuscular qualities. Nevertheless, the use of CT seems more effective than VOL. In postsurgical rehabilitation, both ST and CT are more effective than VOL. Actually, following knee surgery, ST and CT compensate for volume and muscle strength deficits with more efficiency than does VOL.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app