We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
EVALUATION STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
VALIDATION STUDY
Determining the accuracy of a rapid point-of-care test for determining Rh(D) phenotype.
Academic Emergency Medicine 2005 May
OBJECTIVES: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of a point-of-care method for identifying Rh(D) phenotype.
METHODS: Rh(D) was determined using preserved whole blood via standard laboratory methods. Comparison testing was conducted using the HealthTEST Rh(D) card (Akers Laboratories, Thorofare, NJ). Results of the card test were visually interpreted and recorded. To achieve sensitivity and specificity of 99% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 98% to 100%), 380 Rh-positive and 380 Rh-negative samples were required. During card testing, convenience sampling was used. Card results were compared with official results, and statistical analysis was conducted.
RESULTS: In identifying Rh(D)-positive phenotype, the card had a sensitivity of 98.9% and a specificity of 99.7% (95% CI = 0.99 +/- 0.01). For Rh(D)-negative phenotype, the card had a sensitivity of 99.7% and a specificity of 98.9% (95% CI = 0.99 +/- 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In identifying type D (Rh positive or Rh negative), the card achieves sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to warrant further study.
METHODS: Rh(D) was determined using preserved whole blood via standard laboratory methods. Comparison testing was conducted using the HealthTEST Rh(D) card (Akers Laboratories, Thorofare, NJ). Results of the card test were visually interpreted and recorded. To achieve sensitivity and specificity of 99% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 98% to 100%), 380 Rh-positive and 380 Rh-negative samples were required. During card testing, convenience sampling was used. Card results were compared with official results, and statistical analysis was conducted.
RESULTS: In identifying Rh(D)-positive phenotype, the card had a sensitivity of 98.9% and a specificity of 99.7% (95% CI = 0.99 +/- 0.01). For Rh(D)-negative phenotype, the card had a sensitivity of 99.7% and a specificity of 98.9% (95% CI = 0.99 +/- 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In identifying type D (Rh positive or Rh negative), the card achieves sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to warrant further study.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app