Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of superior oblique tendon expander to superior oblique tenotomy for the management of superior oblique overaction and Brown syndrome.

We compared surgical results of superior oblique tenotomy to the superior oblique silicone expander for the treatment of superior oblique overaction and Brown syndrome. Of 24 patients with bilateral superior oblique overaction, 13 underwent tenotomy and 11 had the silicone expander procedure. Reduction of A-pattern to within 10 prism diopters was achieved in 12/13 (92.3%) tenotomy patients and in 10/11 (90.9%) patients undergoing silicone expander (P greater than .05). Correction of superior oblique overaction on versions to within +/- 1 dysfunction was achieved in 22/26 (84.6%) of the tenotomies, and 21/22 (95.5%) silicone expander procedures (P greater than .05). Zero superior oblique dysfunction was found after 14/26 (53.8%) tenotomy procedures versus 18/22 (81.8%) silicone expander operations (P = .041). Superior oblique paresis occurred postoperatively in 4/13 (30.8%) tenotomy patients, whereas none of the 11 patients in the silicone expander group had superior oblique paresis (P = .044). Six patients who underwent superior oblique tenotomy for superior oblique overaction had preoperative stereopsis; following surgery, only two maintained the same level of stereopsis, and three patients totally lost all stereo acuity. All patients in the silicone expander group either maintained or had improved stereo acuity postoperatively. Seven patients with true Brown syndrome were operated on: three underwent the silicone expander procedure and four had a superior oblique tenotomy with an ipsilateral inferior oblique recession. The combination of superior oblique tenotomy with simultaneous ipsilateral inferior oblique recession resulted in an undercorrection in two of the four patients, whereas all three patients in the silicone expander group showed excellent ocular motility postoperatively, with two having normal versions and one a -1 residual limitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app