COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Increased cost effectiveness with nesiritide vs. milrinone or dobutamine in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure.

Despite recent advances in the treatment of patients with acute decompensated heart failure, the cost of treatment for such patients remains considerable. IV diuretics, vasodilators, and positive inotropic agents are commonly prescribed. A retrospective data analysis was conducted to determine the cost effectiveness of nesiritide compared with milrinone and dobutamine administered in a hospital setting during episodes of acute decompensated heart failure. Nesiritide-treated patients demonstrated a significantly lower overall hospital length of stay, intensive care unit length of stay, and average cost per case compared with dobutamine or milrinone. Although the acquisition cost of nesiritide was higher than that of milrinone and dobutamine, nesiritide was a more cost-effective treatment option for patients with acute decompensated heart failure in this study.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app