Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in patients with carcinoma of the larynx: diagnostic accuracy and impact on clinical management.

Laryngoscope 2006 Februrary
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to assess the value of F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with carcinoma of the larynx as compared with PET and CT alone and to assess the impact of PET/CT on further clinical management.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, nonrandomized study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients with laryngeal cancer had 51 PET/CT examinations. There were 34 men and eight women, aged 39 to 80 years. All studies were interpreted prospectively with knowledge of the clinical history and results of previous imaging tests. The performance of different imaging modalities was compared on both a study- and lesion-based analysis for sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. Changes in patient care resulting from the PET/CT studies were recorded.

RESULTS: The study analysis showed that PET/CT had a sensitivity of 92%, specificity 96%, PPV 96%, NPV 92%, and accuracy of 94% as compared with 92%, 73%, 76%, 91%, and 82% for PET, and 88%, 8%, 48%, 40%, and 51% for CT, respectively. There were 112 suspicious sites evaluated in the 51 studies. PET/CT altered management in 25 patients (59%) by sparing previously planned diagnostic procedures (n=13), by changing the planned therapeutic approach (n=9), and by guiding a biopsy to a metabolically active laryngeal area (n=3).

CONCLUSIONS: The performance of PET/CT is better than standalone PET or CT in patients with cancer of the larynx. PET/CT had a major impact on management of 59% of patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app