Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

False-positive rate in prenatal diagnosis of surgical anomalies.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Technical refinements and increasingly sophisticated equipment have led to higher sensitivity in prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformations; however, such progress may be accompanied by decreased specificity. The aim of this study is to evaluate evolution of prenatal diagnosis from the first sonographic suspicion of fetal anomaly until after delivery (diagnosis confirmed, resolution before birth, healthy baby, or affected with different disorder) to document rate of false-positive (FP) results.

METHODS: Retrospective review of prenatal ultrasound examinations performed at our institution between 2000 and 2002 was conducted. The series includes pregnancies referred to our department after detection of thoracic and abdominal anomalies at routine obstetrical sonography and with a follow-up comprising at least the first 6 months of life. Urologic malformations were excluded. Those fetuses who proved healthy at birth were considered FP results.

RESULTS: One hundred fifty-seven fetuses/neonates underwent complete follow-up. Prenatal diagnosis of esophageal atresia resulted in 3 (27%) of 11 FPs. Finding of dilated bowel, isolated or associated with hyperechogenicity or ascites, was not predictive of small bowel obstruction in 7 (41%) of 17 fetuses. No FPs were found with regard to abdominal wall defects (8 gastroschisis and 26 omphaloceles, all confirmed at birth). Concerning thoracic malformations, no FPs were seen among the 28 cases of congenital diaphragmatic hernia, whereas diagnosis of lung malformation presented a specificity of 97% (1/28 FP). Ovarian cysts accounted for an FP rate of 17% (4/23 FPs). Overall, a percentage of FP of 12% (6/50) was seen in 2000, of 11% (5/44) in 2001, and 9% (6/63) in 2002, with no statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS: Because of the high FP rate regarding some particular anomalies, unnecessary psychological burden to prospective parents may ensue. This issue should be dealt with in future prospective studies.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app