We have located links that may give you full text access.
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Analysis of gene probes and gene amplification techniques for diagnosis and monitoring of treatment in childhood leprosy.
Leprosy Review 2006 June
Nucleic acid sequences of Mycobacterium leprae were detected using gene probes hybridizing with targeting ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA), ribosomal DNA (16S rDNA) and gene amplification techniques (PCR) in skin lesion of paediatric leprosy patients and the effect of treatment on the by these methods. Eighty paediatric leprosy patients were included in the study. Most cases (79%) were between 9 and 16 years of age. Cases were divided into three groups according to treatment status, viz. untreated (30), undergoing treatment (30), and at the end of treatment (20). Clinical and slit smear examination for acid fast bacilli (AFB) was performed and nucleic acids were extracted and fractionated from skin biopsies. M. leprae specific 16S rRNA and 16S rDNA was detected by hybridization with gene probes whereas the 36 kDa gene sequence was detected by a gene amplification assay (PCR). The cases were classified as paucibacillary (PB) and multibacillary (MB) by the standard criteria of WHO (1988). Positivity of 16S rRNA in PB cases decreased from 60% in untreated to 10.5% after 4-8 months of treatment whereas for 16S r DNA, it decreased from 50% to 21%, for PCR from 70% to 36.8% for the same specimen, and all became negative at 1 year. Similar trends were seen in MB cases where positivity in smear positive untreated cases decreased from 100% to 56.2% with 16S rRNA and 42.8% with 16S rDNA and PCR, respectively, after 9-12 months of treatment and all became negative at 2 years, except one case which remained positive with PCR. Similar results were observed in smear negative MB cases, 100% positivity detected by 16S r RNA and PCR, 75% detected by 16S rDNA decreased to zero after 9-12 months of therapy. This study suggests the potential usefulness of gene probes targeting 16S rRNA and 16S rDNA and PCR as supportive molecular tools for diagnosis of smear negative evolving MB disease and also monitoring the response to treatment, these observations however, needs to be validated in prospective follow up studies.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Anti-Arrhythmic Effects of Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Their Role in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: From Beta-Blockers to Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Beyond.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 Februrary 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app