Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes.

PURPOSE: To compare the biomechanical properties of normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and keratoconic corneas evaluated by corneal hysteresis and the corneal resistance factor measured with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA).

SETTINGS: Instituto Oftalmológico de Alicante, Vissum, Alicante, Spain.

METHODS: Two hundred fifty eyes were divided into 3 groups: normal (control group), post-LASIK, and keratoconus. The corneal biomechanical properties were measured with the ORA, which uses a dynamic bidirectional applanation process. The main outcome measures were intraocular pressure, corneal hysteresis, and the corneal resistance factor.

RESULTS: The control group had 165 eyes; the LASIK group, 65 eyes; and the keratoconus group, 21 eyes. In the control group, the mean corneal hysteresis value was 10.8 mm Hg +/- 1.5 (SD) and the mean corneal resistance factor, 11.0 +/- 1.6 mm Hg. The corneal hysteresis value was lower in older eyes, and the difference between the youngest age group (9 to 14 years) and oldest age group (60 to 80 years) was statistically significant (P = .01, t test). One month after LASIK, corneal hysteresis and the corneal resistance factor decreased significantly, from 10.44 to 9.3 mm Hg and from 10.07 to 8.13 mm Hg, respectively. In the keratoconus group, the mean corneal hysteresis was 7.5 +/- 1.2 mm Hg and the mean corneal resistance factor, 6.2 +/- 1.9 mm Hg. There were statistically significant differences in both biomechanical parameters between keratoconic eyes and post-LASIK eyes (P<.001, t test).

CONCLUSIONS: The corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor values were significantly lower in keratoconic eyes than in post-LASIK eyes. Future work is needed to determine whether these differences are useful in detecting keratoconus when other diagnostic tests are equivocal.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app