We have located links that may give you full text access.
Biometric study of tooth size in normal, crowded, and spaced permanent dentitions.
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2007 September
INTRODUCTION: At present, there is a void in the orthodontist's armamentarium with regard to the assessment of malocclusion due, in part, to tooth size. A biometric study of tooth size was carried out to examine the extent to which tooth size contributes to dental crowding or spacing.
METHODS: A sample of 240 orthodontic study casts was selected from a larger sample. These casts met the selection criteria. The sample was divided into crowded, spaced, and normal dentition groups with 80 casts in each group. The criterion of grouping was based on the tooth size-arch length discrepancy in the arch. Each group comprised 40 maxillary and 40 mandibular casts that were further divided equally by sex. The data were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Mesiodistal crown dimensions of individual teeth, the sum of the incisors, and the sum of the canines and the premolars were uniformly larger in crowded arches than in normal and spaced dentition groups. Mesiodistal crown dimensions of individual teeth were smaller in the spaced arches compared with normal dental arches, but the difference was significant only in the combined mesiodistal crown dimensions of the mandibular incisors. Correlations of the combined mesiodistal crown dimensions of the incisors with the combined mesiodistal crown dimensions of the canines and the premolars were positive in all 3 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Mesiodistal tooth size is an important factor in the assessment of crowding or spacing and in orthodontic treatment planning.
METHODS: A sample of 240 orthodontic study casts was selected from a larger sample. These casts met the selection criteria. The sample was divided into crowded, spaced, and normal dentition groups with 80 casts in each group. The criterion of grouping was based on the tooth size-arch length discrepancy in the arch. Each group comprised 40 maxillary and 40 mandibular casts that were further divided equally by sex. The data were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS: Mesiodistal crown dimensions of individual teeth, the sum of the incisors, and the sum of the canines and the premolars were uniformly larger in crowded arches than in normal and spaced dentition groups. Mesiodistal crown dimensions of individual teeth were smaller in the spaced arches compared with normal dental arches, but the difference was significant only in the combined mesiodistal crown dimensions of the mandibular incisors. Correlations of the combined mesiodistal crown dimensions of the incisors with the combined mesiodistal crown dimensions of the canines and the premolars were positive in all 3 groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Mesiodistal tooth size is an important factor in the assessment of crowding or spacing and in orthodontic treatment planning.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app