Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Determinants of repair type, reintervention, and mortality in 393 children with double-outlet right ventricle.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to define the prevalence of definitive end-states and their determinants in children with double-outlet right ventricle.

METHODS: We performed a clinical record review of 393 children with double-outlet right ventricle presenting to our institution from 1980 to 2000.

RESULTS: Double-outlet right ventricle classification was as follows: subaortic ventricular septal defect with or without pulmonary stenosis in 47%, subpulmonic ventricular septal defect in 23%, noncommitted ventricular septal defect in 26%, and doubly committed ventricular septal defect in 4%. Hypoplastic ventricles were present in 39%, pulmonary stenosis was present in 65%, and aortic arch obstruction was present in 24%. Biventricular repair was performed in 194 patients (55%) at a median age of 10 months (range: birth to 14.0 years), and the Fontan operation (n = 182; 23%) was performed at a median age of 3.7 years (range: 6 months to 14.9 years). Results improved over time (P < .001). Factors discriminating among end-states included younger patient age at presentation (P < .001), lower weight (P < .001), and adequacy of left-sided heart structures, especially the size of the left ventricle (P < .001), aortic arch (P < .001), and mitral valve (P = .004). For complex double-outlet right ventricle, Rastelli-type repair increased early reintervention risk (P = .04) and late post-repair mortality (P = .02), whereas the arterial switch operation increased early post-repair mortality (P = .02) with a benefit of improved late post-repair survival.

CONCLUSIONS: Biventricular repair, especially Rastelli-type reconstruction, is associated with higher late mortality and reintervention than is Fontan repair. The wisdom of extending biventricular repair to borderline anatomic candidates with hypoplastic left-sided structures or a nonsubaortic ventricular septal defect is questionable.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app