We have located links that may give you full text access.
Cervical crossing laminar screws: early clinical results and complications.
Neurosurgery 2007 November
OBJECTIVE: C2 crossing laminar screws are a new technique for axis fixation with a purported lower risk for neurological or vascular injury. However, to date, few clinical series on this technique have appeared in the peer-reviewed literature. This report describes our initial clinical experience and complications using this new spinal fixation technique.
METHODS: Thirty patients underwent high cervical intralaminar fixation with crossing intralaminar screws. Indications for surgery included occiput to cervical fixation for basilar invagination in six patients, fixation for atlantoaxial subluxation or trauma in six patients, cervical swan neck deformity in four patients, and laminectomy and instrumented fusion for cervical stenosis in 14 patients. Two cases involved C3 fixation resulting from congenital anomalies. A total of 59 screws were placed, and the patients were assessed both clinically and radiographically with postoperative computed tomographic scans.
RESULTS: There were no intraoperative complications and no cases of neurological worsening or vascular injury from hardware placement. One patient reported local neck pain resulting from hardware prominence. Computed tomographic scans demonstrated a partial dorsal laminar breach in 11 patients and violation of the spinal canal in one patient. None of these resulted in neurological symptoms. Early hardware fractures were observed in two patients.
CONCLUSION: Crossing C2 laminar screws provide the surgeon with an expanded armamentarium for fixation in the high cervical spine. This technique is straightforward and easily adopted. However, the unique position of the screw heads may result in increased stress and strain on the intralaminar screws. Thus, larger diameter screws or additional fixation points at adjacent levels are recommended.
METHODS: Thirty patients underwent high cervical intralaminar fixation with crossing intralaminar screws. Indications for surgery included occiput to cervical fixation for basilar invagination in six patients, fixation for atlantoaxial subluxation or trauma in six patients, cervical swan neck deformity in four patients, and laminectomy and instrumented fusion for cervical stenosis in 14 patients. Two cases involved C3 fixation resulting from congenital anomalies. A total of 59 screws were placed, and the patients were assessed both clinically and radiographically with postoperative computed tomographic scans.
RESULTS: There were no intraoperative complications and no cases of neurological worsening or vascular injury from hardware placement. One patient reported local neck pain resulting from hardware prominence. Computed tomographic scans demonstrated a partial dorsal laminar breach in 11 patients and violation of the spinal canal in one patient. None of these resulted in neurological symptoms. Early hardware fractures were observed in two patients.
CONCLUSION: Crossing C2 laminar screws provide the surgeon with an expanded armamentarium for fixation in the high cervical spine. This technique is straightforward and easily adopted. However, the unique position of the screw heads may result in increased stress and strain on the intralaminar screws. Thus, larger diameter screws or additional fixation points at adjacent levels are recommended.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Anti-Arrhythmic Effects of Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Their Role in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: From Beta-Blockers to Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Beyond.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 Februrary 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app