Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Corneal endothelial cell loss after cataract extraction by using ultrasound phacoemulsification versus a fluid-based system.

Cornea 2008 January
PURPOSE: To compare in vivo corneal endothelial cell loss (ECL) after fluid-based versus ultrasound phacoemulsification.

METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, 2 groups of 21 patients underwent phacoemulsification with ultrasound (group 1) or a fluid-based system (group 2). A "divide and conquer" method with capsular bag lens implantation was performed. Cataracts graded up to nuclear opalescence 4.9 in Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III) only were included. Endothelial cell density (ECD), percent hexagonality, endothelial cell area (ECA), coefficient of variation in cell size, and central corneal pachymetry were measured preoperatively, 7 days, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed by using a 2-tailed Student t test.

RESULTS: Average nuclear opalescence was identical in both groups (P = 0.908). Mean ECD was 1867 +/- 451 and 2031 +/- 400 cells/mm at 3 months postoperatively. Mean ECL was 498 +/- 415 (20.6% +/- 17.1%) and 302 +/- 302 cells/mm (13.3% +/- 13.2%) at 7 days, 589 +/- 342 (24.3% +/- 14%) and 254 +/- 214 cells/mm (11.2% +/- 9.1%) at 1 month, and 555 +/- 340 (22.9% +/- 14%) and 247 +/- 208 cells/mm (10.9% +/- 9.1%) at 3 months in groups 1 and 2, respectively. ECL was significantly lower for group 1 than for group 2 (P < 0.001) after the first postoperative month. A significant increase in ECA was also observed at the first and third (P = 0.012) postoperative months.

CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed significantly lower ECL after phacoemulsification for a fluid-based versus an ultrasound system. The fluid-based method was safer than conventional ultrasound in cataract surgery, with a nuclear opalescence graded up to 4.9 in the LOCS III classification.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app