Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A comparison of the crescentic and Mau osteotomies for correction of hallux valgus.

UNLABELLED: We retrospectively compared crescentic and Mau osteotomies used to treat a total of 39 cases of hallux abductovalgus. Follow-up was possible in 10 of the crescentic cases (mean 228 days) and 24 of the Mau cases (mean 245 days). Preoperatively, the mean first intermetatarsal and hallux abductus angles were 17.5 degrees and 35.4 degrees , respectively, in the crescentic group; and 16.6 degrees and 31.3 degrees , respectively, in the Mau group. Postoperatively, these same radiographic angles were 11.7 degrees and 18.9 degrees , respectively, in the crescentic group; and 9.8 degrees and 12.9 degrees , respectively, in the Mau group, and these differences were not statistically significant. Complications included metatarsus primus elevatus (crescentic 7, Mau 2), lesser metatarsal transfer lesion (crescentic 1, Mau 0), nonunion (crescentic 5, Mau 1), revisional surgery (crescentic 0, Mau 1), and transarticular hardware (crescentic 3, Mau 0). The incidence of complications in the crescentic group was 60%, whereas that in the Mau group was 37.5%; this difference was not statistically significant (P = .276). Analysis by the type of complication revealed statistically significant differences between the crescentic and Mau groups in regard to metatarsus primus elevatus (70% versus 8.3%, P = .001), transarticular hardware (30% versus 0%, P = .02), and nonunion (50% versus 4.2%, P = .006). In conclusion, crescentic and Mau osteotomies satisfactorily corrected the first intermetatarsal and hallux abductus angles in patients that fit our inclusion criteria, although the incidence of postoperative metatarsus primus elevatus, delayed union, and transarticular hardware placement, was higher in the crescentic osteotomy group.

LEVEL OF CLINICAL EVIDENCE: 2.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app