Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Long-term hearing results in gamma knife radiosurgery for acoustic neuromas.

Laryngoscope 2008 June
OBJECTIVES: There are many studies that have examined functional outcomes following Gamma Knife treatment; however, few have reported long-term audiometric data. This study analyzed the long-term hearing results of Gamma Knife radiosurgery in the treatment of acoustic neuromas.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS: Seventeen patients were selected from our acoustic neuroma Gamma Knife registry of 113 patients treated from 1991 to 2005. Pretreatment audiograms were analyzed for pure-tone average and word recognition scores and assigned a Gardner-Robertson classification score (GRC). Either a current audiogram was obtained or the most recent audiogram (if the patient was lost to follow-up) was reviewed from clinic charts and these were compared with the preoperative results. Audiometric data of the pre- and posttreatment normal ear were obtained and used as the patient's own control.

RESULTS: The tumor size ranged from 0.5 to 2.8 cm (mean, 1.33 cm) and patients received a range of 12.5-16 Gy (mean, 13.82 Gy) to 50% isodose line. Patient follow-up ranged from 3 to 82 months with a mean of 33.6 months. Pretreatment pure-tone average for the involved side group was 30.6 dB HL with a word recognition score of 74%. Pretreatment mean GRC was 1.76. posttreatment pure-tone average for the group was 59.7 dB HL with a word recognition score of 37%. posttreatment mean GRC was 3.29. Comparing pre- versus post-Gamma Knife radiosurgery results on the treatment ear, means were statistically significantly different for both pure-tone average and word recognition scores, based on a paired-samples t test (P < .001 for both). The group "normal" ear pure-tone average was 14 dB HL and 17.75 dB HL pre- and posttreatment, respectively. Normal ear pre- and posttreatment word recognition score and GRC were 93% and 98%, and 1.13 and 1.31, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Gamma Knife radiosurgery remains a noninvasive treatment option for patients with acoustic neuromas; however, they may experience a delayed hearing loss. Of those patients with useful audition pretreatment, 42% maintained useful hearing posttreatment.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app