We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
18F-FDG PET of common enhancing malignant brain tumors.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 2008 June
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine whether (18)F-FDG PET can be used to differentiate among common enhancing brain tumors such as lymphoma, high-grade glioma, and metastatic brain tumor.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 34 patients with an enhancing brain tumor on MRI, including seven lymphomas, nine high-grade gliomas, and 18 metastatic tumors. All patients also underwent FDG PET. For PET image analysis, regions of interest were placed over the tumor (T), contralateral cortex (C), and white matter (WM). Average and maximum pixel values were determined at each site. On the basis of these measurements, average and maximum standard uptake values (SUV(avg) and SUV(max)) were calculated, along with activity ratios (T/C(avg), T/WM(avg), T/WM(max), and T/C(max)), and comparisons among lesions were then made.
RESULTS: All parameters were significantly higher for lymphoma than for other tumors (p < 0.01). High-grade gliomas showed significantly higher SUV(avg) and SUV(max) than metastatic tumors (p < 0.05). Other parameters did not differ between lesion types. SUV(max) was the most accurate parameter for distinguishing lymphomas. Using an SUV(max) of 15.0 as a cutoff for diagnosing CNS lymphoma, only one high-grade glioma was found as a false-positive (SUV(max), 18.8).
CONCLUSION: FDG PET may be useful for differentiating common enhancing malignant brain tumors, particularly lymphoma versus high-grade glioma and metastatic tumor. FDG PET can provide useful information for distinguishing between lymphoma and other malignant enhancing brain tumors and is recommended when differential diagnoses are difficult to narrow using MRI alone.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated 34 patients with an enhancing brain tumor on MRI, including seven lymphomas, nine high-grade gliomas, and 18 metastatic tumors. All patients also underwent FDG PET. For PET image analysis, regions of interest were placed over the tumor (T), contralateral cortex (C), and white matter (WM). Average and maximum pixel values were determined at each site. On the basis of these measurements, average and maximum standard uptake values (SUV(avg) and SUV(max)) were calculated, along with activity ratios (T/C(avg), T/WM(avg), T/WM(max), and T/C(max)), and comparisons among lesions were then made.
RESULTS: All parameters were significantly higher for lymphoma than for other tumors (p < 0.01). High-grade gliomas showed significantly higher SUV(avg) and SUV(max) than metastatic tumors (p < 0.05). Other parameters did not differ between lesion types. SUV(max) was the most accurate parameter for distinguishing lymphomas. Using an SUV(max) of 15.0 as a cutoff for diagnosing CNS lymphoma, only one high-grade glioma was found as a false-positive (SUV(max), 18.8).
CONCLUSION: FDG PET may be useful for differentiating common enhancing malignant brain tumors, particularly lymphoma versus high-grade glioma and metastatic tumor. FDG PET can provide useful information for distinguishing between lymphoma and other malignant enhancing brain tumors and is recommended when differential diagnoses are difficult to narrow using MRI alone.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app