COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Determinants of right ventricular outflow tract conduit longevity: a multinational analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The need for conduit replacement in the growing child remains a major problem after right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. We compared two diverse surgical centers with considerable practice variation in Europe and the United States to identify modifiable risk factors that can increase conduit longevity.

DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 194 patients (56 Europe, 138 United States) who underwent primary right ventricular to pulmonary artery conduit placement between January 1987 and March 2003.

PATIENTS: Diagnoses included tetralogy of Fallot with pulmonary atresia, truncus arteriosus, transposition of the great arteries with ventricular septal defect and pulmonary stenosis, and double-outlet right ventricle.

RESULTS: Median age was 7.3 months (range 2 days-29.9 years). Types of conduits included aortic homografts (n = 111), pulmonary homografts (n = 48), Contegra conduits (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN) (n = 23), and synthetic conduits (n = 12). Freedom from conduit failure at 5 years was 50% (58% Europe, 48% United States, P = NS). On multivariate analysis, smaller conduit diameter (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, P < .001) and conduits other than pulmonary homografts (synthetic conduits [HR 3.17, P = .01], Contegra conduits [HR 2.80, P = .02], aortic homografts [HR 1.56, P = .05]) predicted shorter time to conduit failure. In addition, time to failure was longer for patients undergoing transcatheter intervention. Different surgical techniques in conduit preparation and insertion did not influence conduit longevity.

CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the two diverse surgical centers showed that to increase conduit longevity, one should choose the largest possible conduit, use a pulmonary homograft, and consider children whose conduits develop obstruction as candidates for transcatheter intervention.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app