CASE REPORTS
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Management of ingested foreign bodies. How justifiable is a waiting policy?

Foreign body ingestion is a commonly seen accident in emergencies, usually in children (80%), elderly, mentally impaired, or alcoholic individuals, whereas it may occur intentionally in prisoners or psychiatric patients. According to the literature, 90% of ingested foreign bodies pass through the gastrointestinal tract without complications, 10% to 20% necessitate endoscopic removal, whereas only 1% of them will finally need surgical intervention. In clinical practice, we often face the dilemma of choosing the appropriate treatment modality. We present 13 cases treated in our department, emphasizing in a "waiting and close observation" policy. Among these cases, only 1 patient needed to be operated because of obstruction of ileocecal valve by a large coin. Indications for treatment where applicable are also being discussed.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app