We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Absence of relationship between oblique muscle size and bielschowsky head tilt phenomenon in clinically diagnosed superior oblique palsy.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 2009 January
PURPOSE: To study whether the variation in maximum oblique muscle size accounts for individual variation in the Bielschowsky head tilt phenomenon (BHTP) in clinically diagnosed superior oblique (SO) palsy.
METHODS: Seventeen subjects with clinically diagnosed early-onset or idiopathic SO palsy and 14 normal subjects were enrolled in the study. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in coronal and sagittal planes was used for quantitative morphometry of inferior oblique (IO) and SO muscles. Maximum cross-sectional area of the SO and IO cross section at the mid-inferior rectus crossing were determined in central gaze and compared with paretic eye hypertropia on ipsilesional versus contralesional head tilt.
RESULTS: Mean (+/-SD) maximum SO cross section was 18.1 +/- 3.2 mm(2) in normal subjects, 14.2 +/- 6.8 mm(2) ipsilesional to SO palsy, and 19.2 +/- 4.5 mm(2) contralesional to SO palsy. The ipsilesional SO cross section was significantly smaller than the contralesional (P = 0.004) and normal (P = 0.01) ones. The mean IO cross section was 18.3 +/- 3.5 mm(2) in normal subjects, 21.3 +/- 7.9 mm(2) ipsilesional to SO palsy (P = 0.43), and 22.0 +/- 6.7 mm(2) contralesional to SO palsy (P = 0.26). Hyperdeviation varied with head tilt by 20.1 +/- 5.5 degrees in subjects with SO atrophy, and 10.3 +/- 5.6 degrees in subjects without SO atrophy (P = 0.003). Although oblique muscle cross sections did not correlate with BHTP, subjects with clinically diagnosed SO palsy segregated into groups exhibiting normal versus atrophic SO size.
CONCLUSIONS: SO size does not account for the variation in BHTP in clinically diagnosed SO palsy, supporting the proposition that the BHTP is nonspecific for SO function.
METHODS: Seventeen subjects with clinically diagnosed early-onset or idiopathic SO palsy and 14 normal subjects were enrolled in the study. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in coronal and sagittal planes was used for quantitative morphometry of inferior oblique (IO) and SO muscles. Maximum cross-sectional area of the SO and IO cross section at the mid-inferior rectus crossing were determined in central gaze and compared with paretic eye hypertropia on ipsilesional versus contralesional head tilt.
RESULTS: Mean (+/-SD) maximum SO cross section was 18.1 +/- 3.2 mm(2) in normal subjects, 14.2 +/- 6.8 mm(2) ipsilesional to SO palsy, and 19.2 +/- 4.5 mm(2) contralesional to SO palsy. The ipsilesional SO cross section was significantly smaller than the contralesional (P = 0.004) and normal (P = 0.01) ones. The mean IO cross section was 18.3 +/- 3.5 mm(2) in normal subjects, 21.3 +/- 7.9 mm(2) ipsilesional to SO palsy (P = 0.43), and 22.0 +/- 6.7 mm(2) contralesional to SO palsy (P = 0.26). Hyperdeviation varied with head tilt by 20.1 +/- 5.5 degrees in subjects with SO atrophy, and 10.3 +/- 5.6 degrees in subjects without SO atrophy (P = 0.003). Although oblique muscle cross sections did not correlate with BHTP, subjects with clinically diagnosed SO palsy segregated into groups exhibiting normal versus atrophic SO size.
CONCLUSIONS: SO size does not account for the variation in BHTP in clinically diagnosed SO palsy, supporting the proposition that the BHTP is nonspecific for SO function.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app