We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Image-guided percutaneous treatment of abdominal-pelvic abscesses: a 5-year experience.
La Radiologia Medica 2008 October
PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of image-guided percutaneous drainage in treating abdominal and pelvic abscesses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From August 2001 to August 2006, 95 patients (49 men and 46 women; mean age 61 years, range 25-92) with 107 abscesses underwent image-guided percutaneous drainage. Thirty-one abscesses were retroperitoneal (9 peripancreatic, 17 perirenal, 5 pararenal), 37 intraperitoneal (2 in communication with the small bowel), 8 intrahepatic (2 in communication with the extrahepatic biliary system and 2 with the intrahepatic biliary system), 4 perisplenic and 27 pelvic (4 in communication with the large bowel). Seventy-one of 107 procedures were performed with ultrasonographic (US) guidance and 36/107 with computed tomography (CT) guidance. All procedures were carried out with 8-to 14-Fr pigtail drainage catheters.
RESULTS: Immediate technical success was achieved in 107/107 fluid collections. No major complications occurred. In 98/107 abscesses, we obtained progressive shrinkage of the collection (>50%) with consequent clinical success. In 9/107 cases, percutaneous drainage was unable to resolve the fluid collection. There were 12 cases of catheter displacement and six of obstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous drainage is feasible and effective in treating abdominal and pelvic abscesses. It may be considered both as a preparatory step for surgery and a valuable alternative to open surgery. Failure of the procedure does not, however, preclude a subsequent surgical operation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From August 2001 to August 2006, 95 patients (49 men and 46 women; mean age 61 years, range 25-92) with 107 abscesses underwent image-guided percutaneous drainage. Thirty-one abscesses were retroperitoneal (9 peripancreatic, 17 perirenal, 5 pararenal), 37 intraperitoneal (2 in communication with the small bowel), 8 intrahepatic (2 in communication with the extrahepatic biliary system and 2 with the intrahepatic biliary system), 4 perisplenic and 27 pelvic (4 in communication with the large bowel). Seventy-one of 107 procedures were performed with ultrasonographic (US) guidance and 36/107 with computed tomography (CT) guidance. All procedures were carried out with 8-to 14-Fr pigtail drainage catheters.
RESULTS: Immediate technical success was achieved in 107/107 fluid collections. No major complications occurred. In 98/107 abscesses, we obtained progressive shrinkage of the collection (>50%) with consequent clinical success. In 9/107 cases, percutaneous drainage was unable to resolve the fluid collection. There were 12 cases of catheter displacement and six of obstruction.
CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous drainage is feasible and effective in treating abdominal and pelvic abscesses. It may be considered both as a preparatory step for surgery and a valuable alternative to open surgery. Failure of the procedure does not, however, preclude a subsequent surgical operation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app