We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Usefulness of computed tomography in differentiating transmural infarction from nontransmural ischemia of the small intestine in patients with acute mesenteric venous thrombosis.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 2008 September
OBJECTIVE: To determine computed tomographic findings that are helpful in differentiating transmural infarction from nontransmural ischemia in patients with mesenteric ischemia secondary to acute mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT).
METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with symptomatic acute MVT were categorized into 2 groups: a transmural infarction (n = 13) and a nontransmural ischemia group (n = 14) based on findings at surgery and clinical follow-up. Computed tomographic scans were retrospectively reviewed by the consensus of 2 radiologists. Computed tomographic findings were compared between the 2 groups using the Fisher exact and the independent sample t test. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the best predictors for differentiating transmural infarction from nontransmural ischemia.
RESULTS: Bowel segments with homogeneous enhancement (P = 0.001), decreased enhancement (P = 0.001), and indistinct outer margins (P = 0.006) were significantly more common in the transmural infarction group than in the nontransmural ischemia group. The differences in maximal lumen diameter (P = 0.027), extent of mesenteric haziness (P = 0.018), and amount of ascites (P = 0.035) were significant between the 2 groups. On multifactorial logistic regression analysis, decreased enhancement (P = 0.007) and maximal lumen diameter (P = 0.039) were independent significant variables in differentiating transmural infarction from nontransmural ischemia.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute MVT, computed tomography is valuable in differentiating transmural infarction from nontransmural ischemia.
METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with symptomatic acute MVT were categorized into 2 groups: a transmural infarction (n = 13) and a nontransmural ischemia group (n = 14) based on findings at surgery and clinical follow-up. Computed tomographic scans were retrospectively reviewed by the consensus of 2 radiologists. Computed tomographic findings were compared between the 2 groups using the Fisher exact and the independent sample t test. Multifactorial logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the best predictors for differentiating transmural infarction from nontransmural ischemia.
RESULTS: Bowel segments with homogeneous enhancement (P = 0.001), decreased enhancement (P = 0.001), and indistinct outer margins (P = 0.006) were significantly more common in the transmural infarction group than in the nontransmural ischemia group. The differences in maximal lumen diameter (P = 0.027), extent of mesenteric haziness (P = 0.018), and amount of ascites (P = 0.035) were significant between the 2 groups. On multifactorial logistic regression analysis, decreased enhancement (P = 0.007) and maximal lumen diameter (P = 0.039) were independent significant variables in differentiating transmural infarction from nontransmural ischemia.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute MVT, computed tomography is valuable in differentiating transmural infarction from nontransmural ischemia.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app