We have located links that may give you full text access.
MRI prediction of therapeutic response to epidural steroid injection in patients with cervical radiculopathy.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings can be used to predict therapeutic responses to cervical epidural steroid injections (CESI) in patients with cervical radiculopathy.
DESIGN: Retrospective single-center study. Patients were categorized by presence or absence of four types of cervical MRI findings (disk herniation, nerve root compromise, neuroforaminal stenosis, and central canal stenosis). Thus, for each of the four types of MRI findings, there was a positive-MRI arm and a negative-MRI arm. Severities of these MRI findings were also noted. The treatment outcome variable was the change in Neck Disability Index (NDI) score after CESI. For each of the four MRI finding types, t test was done to see if there was any significant difference in the outcome between positive-MRI arm and negative-MRI arm. Then, we repeated the same analyses after adjusting the arms to include only those of "major" radiologic severity in the positive-MRI arms.
RESULTS: After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 32 patients were included. Only the presence, vs. absence, of central canal stenosis was associated with significantly superior therapeutic response to CESI (mean NDI improvement of 14.14 in positive-MRI arm, vs. mean NDI worsening of 2.11 in negative-MRI arm; P = 0.012). After controlling for other MRI finding types, the statistical significance still held for central canal stenosis (beta = -0.438; P = 0.022). When only the patients with MRI findings of major severities were considered as positive results, central canal stenosis was still the only finding type associated with significantly superior outcome (mean NDI improvement of 23.00 in positive-MRI arm, vs. mean NDI improvement of 0.85 in negative-MRI arm; P = 0.002). Controlling for other MRI finding types, the statistical significance still held for central canal stenosis (beta = -0.534; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with central canal stenosis achieved significantly better functional outcome after CESI than those without. Hence, the MRI finding of central canal stenosis is a potential indication that CESI may be merited.
DESIGN: Retrospective single-center study. Patients were categorized by presence or absence of four types of cervical MRI findings (disk herniation, nerve root compromise, neuroforaminal stenosis, and central canal stenosis). Thus, for each of the four types of MRI findings, there was a positive-MRI arm and a negative-MRI arm. Severities of these MRI findings were also noted. The treatment outcome variable was the change in Neck Disability Index (NDI) score after CESI. For each of the four MRI finding types, t test was done to see if there was any significant difference in the outcome between positive-MRI arm and negative-MRI arm. Then, we repeated the same analyses after adjusting the arms to include only those of "major" radiologic severity in the positive-MRI arms.
RESULTS: After inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, 32 patients were included. Only the presence, vs. absence, of central canal stenosis was associated with significantly superior therapeutic response to CESI (mean NDI improvement of 14.14 in positive-MRI arm, vs. mean NDI worsening of 2.11 in negative-MRI arm; P = 0.012). After controlling for other MRI finding types, the statistical significance still held for central canal stenosis (beta = -0.438; P = 0.022). When only the patients with MRI findings of major severities were considered as positive results, central canal stenosis was still the only finding type associated with significantly superior outcome (mean NDI improvement of 23.00 in positive-MRI arm, vs. mean NDI improvement of 0.85 in negative-MRI arm; P = 0.002). Controlling for other MRI finding types, the statistical significance still held for central canal stenosis (beta = -0.534; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with central canal stenosis achieved significantly better functional outcome after CESI than those without. Hence, the MRI finding of central canal stenosis is a potential indication that CESI may be merited.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app