We have located links that may give you full text access.
Prognostic significance of contrast-enhancing low-grade gliomas in adults and a review of the literature.
Neurological Research 2009 November
OBJECTIVES: Survival and tumor recurrence for patients with low-grade gliomas is heterogeneous, with reported survival and recurrence times varying by several months to years. The prognostic implications of a contrast-enhancing low-grade glioma remain less well understood.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients who underwent a craniotomy for a hemispheric low-grade glioma (WHO grade II) from 1996 to 2006 at a single institution. Multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify independent associations with survival, recurrence and malignant degeneration. Furthermore, a review of the literature for all works on low-grade gliomas and contrast enhancement was conducted.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-nine patients (87 fibrillary astrocytomas, 89 oligodendrogliomas and 13 mixed gliomas) were available for analysis, with 64 (34%) and 125 (66%) contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing tumors, respectively. There were no significant differences in clinical and treatment-related variables between patients with and without contrast enhancement. After multivariate analysis, contrast enhancement was independently associated with decreased survival (p=0.006) and increased recurrence (p=0.04) and trended toward significance with malignant degeneration (p=0.15). Five-year overall survival, progression-free survival and malignancy-free survival rates for patients with enhancement versus patients without enhancement were 70 versus 85% (p=0.002), 32 versus 49% (p=0.008) and 74 versus 90% (p=0.002), respectively. The review of the literature identified 14 works that fit our criteria. The majority of these published works had design-related limitations including small population size as well as the inclusion of non-WHO grade II gliomas, pediatric patients and patient undergoing biopsy.
DISCUSSION: This study may provide insights into risk stratifying patients with low-grade gliomas and most specifically those that contrast enhance.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all adult patients who underwent a craniotomy for a hemispheric low-grade glioma (WHO grade II) from 1996 to 2006 at a single institution. Multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis was used to identify independent associations with survival, recurrence and malignant degeneration. Furthermore, a review of the literature for all works on low-grade gliomas and contrast enhancement was conducted.
RESULTS: One hundred eighty-nine patients (87 fibrillary astrocytomas, 89 oligodendrogliomas and 13 mixed gliomas) were available for analysis, with 64 (34%) and 125 (66%) contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing tumors, respectively. There were no significant differences in clinical and treatment-related variables between patients with and without contrast enhancement. After multivariate analysis, contrast enhancement was independently associated with decreased survival (p=0.006) and increased recurrence (p=0.04) and trended toward significance with malignant degeneration (p=0.15). Five-year overall survival, progression-free survival and malignancy-free survival rates for patients with enhancement versus patients without enhancement were 70 versus 85% (p=0.002), 32 versus 49% (p=0.008) and 74 versus 90% (p=0.002), respectively. The review of the literature identified 14 works that fit our criteria. The majority of these published works had design-related limitations including small population size as well as the inclusion of non-WHO grade II gliomas, pediatric patients and patient undergoing biopsy.
DISCUSSION: This study may provide insights into risk stratifying patients with low-grade gliomas and most specifically those that contrast enhance.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices 
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app