We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Mechanisms for cardiac output augmentation in patients with a systemic right ventricle.
International Journal of Cardiology 2010 August 21
BACKGROUND: Conflicting data have been published on the differences in cardiac response to exercise between patients with an atrially switched transposition of the great arteries (TGA), and patients with a congenitally corrected TGA (ccTGA). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the differences in cardiac response to exercise in these 2 patient groups with a systemic right ventricle (RV).
METHODS: Thirty four patients (62% male; mean 35, range 21-69 years) with a systemic RV (20 with an atrially switched TGA and 14 with a ccTGA) were included. Exercise tests with Portapres measurements were performed to assess maximal exercise capacity (V'O(2peak)), cardiac index, stroke volume index, and heart rate augmentation. Cardiac function was assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance or Computed Tomography, and serum NT-proBNP levels.
RESULTS: We found that both groups were able to significantly augment cardiac index during exercise. Cardiac index augmentation during exercise was positively related to V'O(2peak) (r=0.37, p<0.05), and independent of resting cardiac function. Although the increase in cardiac index during exercise was similar in both patients with TGA and with ccTGA, mechanisms to achieve this increase differed between groups. ccTGA patients increased both stroke volume and heart rate during exercise. Atrially switched TGA patients augmented heart rate during exercise, but failed to increase stroke volume.
CONCLUSION: Mechanisms to achieve cardiac output augmentation differ between ccTGA patients and TGA patients. We suggest that therapeutic approaches should be tailored to the specific patient group to avoid counterproductive effects.
METHODS: Thirty four patients (62% male; mean 35, range 21-69 years) with a systemic RV (20 with an atrially switched TGA and 14 with a ccTGA) were included. Exercise tests with Portapres measurements were performed to assess maximal exercise capacity (V'O(2peak)), cardiac index, stroke volume index, and heart rate augmentation. Cardiac function was assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance or Computed Tomography, and serum NT-proBNP levels.
RESULTS: We found that both groups were able to significantly augment cardiac index during exercise. Cardiac index augmentation during exercise was positively related to V'O(2peak) (r=0.37, p<0.05), and independent of resting cardiac function. Although the increase in cardiac index during exercise was similar in both patients with TGA and with ccTGA, mechanisms to achieve this increase differed between groups. ccTGA patients increased both stroke volume and heart rate during exercise. Atrially switched TGA patients augmented heart rate during exercise, but failed to increase stroke volume.
CONCLUSION: Mechanisms to achieve cardiac output augmentation differ between ccTGA patients and TGA patients. We suggest that therapeutic approaches should be tailored to the specific patient group to avoid counterproductive effects.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app